Daubert and the Quest for Value-Free "Scientific Knowledge" in the Courtroom
نویسنده
چکیده
منابع مشابه
The Arts of Persuasion in Science and Law: Conflicting Norms in the Courtroom
The Daubert trilogy and the calls for reform that preceded it have echoed through the legal and scientific communities since the early 1990s. Much has been made of the limited views of the scientific enterprise reflected in the Supreme Court’s decisions. Critics argue that the Court accepted a standardized view of science that serves the interests of the business community and key elements of o...
متن کاملAttorney abuses of Daubert hearings: junk science, junk law, or just plain obstruction?
The U.S. Supreme Court case of Daubert v. MerrellDow Pharmaceuticals focused attention on the problem of “junk science” testimony in the courtroom, a decision that led to the emergence of the Daubert hearing as a pre-trial screening device for determining the reliability and relevance of expert testimony. Similar to other useful legal procedural safeguards of due process, alas, the Daubert hear...
متن کاملPredicting the coefficients of the Daubert and Danner correlation using a neural network model
In the present research, three different architectures were investigated to predict the coefficients of the Daubert and Danner equation for calculation of saturated liquid density. The first architecture with 4 network input parameters including critical temperature, critical pressure, critical volume and molecular weight, the second architecture with 6 network input parameters including the on...
متن کاملThe case against differential diagnosis: Daubert, medical causation testimony, and the scientific method.
For the past decade, federal judges have been obligated to serve as gatekeepers and keep scientifically unreliable and irrelevant expert testimony out of the courtroom. The exacting evidentiary standards set forth in the landmark Daubert decision have had a significant impact on numerous areas of legal dispute. Toxic tort litigation, in particular, has been transformed by the standards. This Ar...
متن کاملQuantitative EEG and the Frye and Daubert standards of admissibility.
The 70-year-old Frye standards of "general acceptance" were replaced by the Supreme Court's 1993 Daubert criteria of the scientific method, which established the standards for admissibility of evidence in Federal Court. The four Daubert criteria were: 1- Hypothesis testing, 2- Estimates of error rates, 3- Peer reviewed publication and 4- General acceptance (Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceutical...
متن کامل